Securities Law & Instruments

Headnote

Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications -- mutual funds granted relief from preparing annual management report of fund performance as only in existence for four days prior to first fiscal year end.

Applicable Legislative Provisions

National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure, s. 4.2.

September 24, 2007

IN THE MATTER OF

THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF

BRITISH COLUMBIA, ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN,

MANITOBA, ONTARIO, QUEBEC, NEW BRUNSWICK,

NOVA SCOTIA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR,

THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, YUKON

AND NUNAVUT

(the Jurisdictions)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF

THE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM

FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS

AND

IN THE MATTER OF

MACKENZIE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Mackenzie or the Manager)

AND

MACKENZIE UNIVERSAL GLOBAL

INFRASTRUCTURE FUND & MACKENZIE UNIVERSAL

GLOBAL PROPERTY INCOME FUND (the Funds)

(the Manager and the Funds, collectively, the Filer)

 

MRRS DECISION DOCUMENT

Background

The local securities regulatory authority or regulator (the Decision Maker) in each of the Jurisdictions has received an application from the Filer for a decision under the securities legislation (the Legislation) of the Jurisdictions for an exemption, pursuant to section 17.1 of National Instrument 81-106 Investment Funds Continuous Disclosure (NI 81-106), from the requirement in subsection 4.2 of NI 81-106 to file a management report of fund performance (MRFP) for each Fund for the period ended June 30th 2007 (the Requested Relief).

Under the Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications

(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application, and

(b) this MRRS decision document evidences the decision of each Decision Maker.

Interpretation

Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions have the same meaning in this decision unless they are defined in this decision.

Representations

This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:

1. Mackenzie is a corporation operating under the laws of the Province of Ontario with its head office in Toronto, Ontario.

2. Mackenzie is the manager for several families of mutual funds (the Mackenzie Funds) most of which are sold in every Jurisdiction through independent financial advisors. Mackenzie prepares and files annual and interim MRFPs for all Mackenzie Funds as required by NI 81-106.

3. The Funds became reporting issuers on June 27, 2007, the date on which a receipt for the final simplified prospectus in respect of the Funds was issued by the Decision Makers.

4. The fiscal year end of each Fund is June 30. Pursuant to section 4.2 of NI 81-106, the Funds must prepare an annual MRFP for the period ended June 30, 2007.

5. The Funds were only offered for sale to public as of July 9, 2007. No securities, other than for seed capital purposes, were issued between June 27 and June 30, 2007. Accordingly, there are no measures of performance to report on in the management discussion portion of the MRFP for the reporting period.

6. The limited activities of the Funds for the period from June 27, 2007 to June 30, 2007 do not provide any meaningful information in the financial highlights for the purposes of the preparation of an MRFP.

7. Form 81-106F1 requires that an MRFP contain a discussion of how changes to the investment fund over the financial year affected the overall level of risk associated with an investment in the investment fund, a summary of the results of operations of the investment fund for the financial year in which the management discussion of fund performance pertains, a discussion of the recent developments affecting the investment fund, a discussion of any transactions involving related parties to the investment fund, disclosure of selected financial highlights for the investment fund and a summary of the investment fund's portfolio as at the end of the financial year of the investment fund to which the MRFP pertains. Given the minimal business carried on by the Funds and the fact that the Funds filed their final simplified prospectus four days prior to their fiscal year end, no disclosure on these items can be meaningfully provided in the MRFP.

8. The expense to the Funds of preparing and filing MRFPs would not be justified in view of the benefit to be derived from receiving the MFRPs.

9. The Filer will prepare and file annual audited financial statements for the Funds as required by NI 81-106

Decision

Each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the Decision Maker with the jurisdiction to make the decision has been met.

The decision of the Decision Makers under the Legislation is that the Requested Relief is granted.

"Leslie Byberg
Manager, Investment Funds Branch
Ontario Securities Commission